Download E-books The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays PDF

By Clifford Geertz

In The Interpretation of Cultures, the main unique anthropologist of his new release moved a ways past the conventional confines of his self-discipline to boost an immense new notion of tradition. This groundbreaking publication, winner of the 1974 Sorokin Award of the yankee Sociological organization, helped outline for a whole iteration of anthropologists what their box is finally about.

Show description

Read Online or Download The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays PDF

Similar Anthropology books

Tristes Tropiques

"A magical masterpiece. "—Robert Ardrey. A chronicle of the author's look for a civilization "reduced to its most elementary expression. "

The Meme Machine (Popular Science)

What's a meme? First coined through Richard Dawkins within the egocentric Gene, a meme is any thought, habit, or ability that may be transferred from one individual to a different through imitation: tales, models, innovations, recipes, songs, methods of plowing a box or throwing a baseball or creating a sculpture. The meme is usually some of the most important--and controversial--concepts to emerge because the beginning of the Species seemed approximately a hundred and fifty years in the past.

The Piltdown Forgery

For many years the is still of fossils present in Piltdown, England have been believed to return from a "missing link," a creature with a human skull and an ape's jaw. Dr. Weiner exhibits how he chanced on the reality approximately those is still, and went directly to divulge one of many world's maximum clinical frauds.

Extra resources for The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays

Show sample text content

Speculations at the Interrelations of instruments and Bioloaica1 Evolulion. - in Th� evolution of Man's potential for tradition, cd. J. M. Spuhler (Detroit, 1959), pp. 21-31. n A. I. Hallowell, "Culture, PersonalilY and Society," in A"thropology this present day. ed. A. L. Kroeber (Chicalo. 19B), pp. 597-620. Cf. A. I. Hallowell, "Behavioral Evolution and the Emergence of the Self," in £�ol/ltlol1 and Anthropology: A Ctl1tcn"ial Apprailal. ed. eight. J. Me&&ers (Washinlton, D. C. , 19! 19), pp. 36-60. 19 okay roeber Anthropology, p. ! l73. sr . sixty six the translation OF CULTURES research human maturation with a long time as his period may see grownup. hood as a unexpected transformation of formative years and omit early life al­ jointly. a great instance of this type of cavalier method of temporal considera­ tions is implicit in what's essentially the most widespread type of medical information invoked i n aid of the "difference in variety instead of distinction in measure" view of human tradition; the comparability of guy together with his clos­ est residing family, the pongids, and especially the chimpanzee. guy can speak, can signify, can collect tradition, this argument is going, however the chimpanzee (and, by means of extension, all less-endowed animals) can't. for that reason. guy is exclusive during this regard, and insofar as mentality is con­ cerned "we are faced through a sequence of leaps, no longer an ascending continuum. " 30 yet this overlooks the truth that, even supposing the pongids should be man's closest relations, "close" is an elastic time period and, given a pragmatic time scale from the cvolutionary standpoint, they're particularly now not so shut in any respect, final universal ancestor being not less than an top Pliocene (and on the very so much an higher Oligocene) ape and phy­ letic differentiation having proceeded with ever-increasing rapidity on the grounds that that point. the truth that chimpanzees don't speak is either intercsting and significant, yet to attract from that truth the belief that speech is an all-or- nothing-at-all phenomenon is to break down wherever from one to 40 million years right into a unmarried immediate of time and lose the entire pre­ sapiens hominid line as definitely as our biologist misplaced youth. Inter­ particular comparability of dwelling animals is, if dealt with with care, a legiti­ mate and, in truth, integral machine for deducing common evolution­ ary traits; yet i n a similar approach that the finite wave size of sunshine limits the discrimination attainable in ;>hysical measurements, so the indisputable fact that the nearest dwelling relations of guy are at most sensible lovely a long way re­ moved cousins (flot ancestors) limits the measure of refinement within the degree of evolutionary switch within the hominoid line whilst one confines oneself completely to contrasts among extant varieties. 31 If, to the contrary, we unfold hominid phylogeny out alongside a extra acceptable time scale, education our recognition on what turns out to have occurred i n the "human" line because the radiation of the hominoids. and of :10 L. A. White, " F�ur Stage5 i n the Evolution of Minding," in Tht EVOlution �an. ed. S. Tax (Ch �C8&0 . 1960), pp. 239-253; �he . raument is quite common .

Rated 4.40 of 5 – based on 46 votes